What Approach to the Interpretation of Private Contractual Obligations should Courts Adopt? Could the application of Law affect the so called Welfare State?

  • José Manuel de Torres Perea Universidad de Málaga
Keywords: Private law, capitalism, justice, inequality, welfare state

Abstract

Is private law dominated by savage capitalism? Is justice something that can be bought? Currently we are witnessing a conflict between opposing approaches to the interpretation and application of the law. On one view, the concept of justice, should be taken into account when judges decide legal cases. The alternative view favours legal certainty and the literal interpretation of contracts whether the outcome is just or not. In this lecture we consider these conflicting approaches and analyse what could be the consequences. One consequence could be increasing inequality between citizens, and consequently the concept of “the welfare state” being put at risk.

Received: 12 April 2018
Accepted: 25 June 2018 
Published online: 03 August 2018

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

José Manuel de Torres Perea, Universidad de Málaga

Profesor Titular de Derecho Civil

Published
2018-08-03
How to Cite
de Torres Perea, José Manuel. 2018. “What Approach to the Interpretation of Private Contractual Obligations Should Courts Adopt? Could the Application of Law Affect the so Called Welfare State?”. Estudios De Deusto 66 (1), 161-69. https://doi.org/10.18543/ed-66(1)-2018pp161-169.
Section
Notes