Twitter is not a public forum, but Trump’s profile is. on private censorship of and on digital platforms in the USA

  • Víctor J. Vázquez Alonso Universidad de Sevilla
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18543/ed-68(1)-2020pp475-508
Keywords: First Amendment, Internet, Private Censorship, Twitter, Trump, Section 230.

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to study the recent jurisprudential development in the USA, on the limits that the First Amendment imposes on authorities and professionals in the use of certain blocking tools in social networks. For this, it will be based on the two sentences that have concluded that President Trump cannot block on Twitter. After this, and in light of the Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA), and the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court, it will be argued that this jurisprudential line does not have to alter the consolidated doctrine that protects the private censorship carried out by Internet technology companies on the basis of your corporate liberties.

Received: 10.05.2020
Accepted: 12.06.2020
Published online: 03.07.2020

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Víctor J. Vázquez Alonso, Universidad de Sevilla

Profesor de Derecho Constitucional 

Published
2020-07-03
How to Cite
Vázquez Alonso, Víctor J. 2020. “Twitter Is Not a Public Forum, But Trump’s Profile Is. On Private Censorship of and on Digital Platforms in the USA”. Estudios De Deusto 68 (1), 475-508. https://doi.org/10.18543/ed-68(1)-2020pp475-508.
Issue
Vol. 68 No. 1 (2020)
Section
Studies

Last update: 08/02/2022

The authors, by submitting their manuscripts to the Estudios Deusto. Revista de Derecho Público, accept the conditions listed below on copyright and undertake to comply with them.

  1. Authorship: The author must be the sole creator of the work or legally acting on behalf of and with the full agreement of all the authors.
  2. Copyright, liability and Ethical Guidelines:
    1. Authors warrant that their manuscript is original; has not been previously copyrighted or published in any form; is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; its submission and publication do not violate the Ethical Guidelines of Estudios Deusto. Revista de Derecho Público and any codes (of conduct), laws or any rights of any third party; and no publication payment by the Publisher (University of Deusto) is required.
    2. Authors grant to the Publisher the worldwide, sub-licensable, and royalty-free right to exploit the manuscript in all forms and media of expression, now known or developed in the future, for educational and scholarly purposes.
    3. Authors retain the right to present, display, distribute, develop, and republish their manuscript to progress their scientific career provided the original publication source (Estudios Deusto. Revista de Derecho Público) is properly acknowledged and in a way that does not suggest the Publisher endorses them or their use of the work.
    4. Authors warrant that no permissions or licences of any kind have been granted or will be granted that might infringe the rights granted to the Publisher.
    5. Authors are solely liable for the consequences that may arise from third parties’ complaints about the submitted manuscript and its publication in Estudios de Deusto. Revista de Derecho Público.
  3. Users: Estudios de Deusto. Revista de Derecho Público is an Open Access publication. Its content is free for full and immediate access, reading, search, download, distribution and reuse in any medium or format only for non-commercial purposes and in compliance with any applicable copyright legislation, without prior permission from the Publisher or the author(s). In any case, proper acknowledgement of the original publication source must be made and any changes to the original work must be indicated clearly and in a manner that does not suggest the author’s and or Publisher’s endorsement whatsoever. Any other use of its content in any medium or format, now known or developed in the future, requires prior written permission of the copyright holder.