Some Comments on the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’ Advisory Opinion 26/20. Certain Considerations regarding the ‘power of procedure’

  • Luis A. López Zamora Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel
Keywords: Advisory Opinions, Inter-American Court of Human Rights, Inter-American System of Human Rights, International Procedural Law, Denunciation of the American Convention, Denunciation of the OAS Charter

Abstract

This paper provides an analysis of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACtHR) Advisory Opinion OC-26/20 (AO 26). It analyzes that decision and, in broader terms, the advisory powers of the IACtHR, which have been enhanced over the years by the Court itself. The Court has made its advisory opinions binding in practice by including them in the conventionality control doctrine and by declaring them obligatory for the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights. The AO 26 is particularly important in that regard, because it shows how those decisions can affect the overall Inter-American System’s architecture. The main argument is that –on occasion–, procedural mechanisms –like an advisory opinion– are used to achieve purposes that cannot be attained using other means. This is mainly due, to the way advisory opinions are requested in the Inter-American System of Human Rights and the law that can be interpreted through them.

Received: 04.10.2022
Accepted: 05.11.2022

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Luis A. López Zamora, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel

Research Fellow
Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for International, European and Regulatory Procedural Law
Doctoral Researcher

Published
2022-12-27
How to Cite
López Zamora, Luis A. 2022. “Some Comments on the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’ Advisory Opinion 26/20. Certain Considerations Regarding the ‘power of procedure’”. Estudios De Deusto 70 (2), 277-307. https://doi.org/10.18543/ed.2653.
Section
Case Law