The crime of influence peddling involving actual influence in the Peruvian Criminal Code: A critique of its legal structure

Keywords: Criminal law, public corruption, public administration, influence peddling, legal asset

Abstract

Criminal law doctrine has developed positions both for and against incorporating influence peddling in its actual form as a crime, given that the peddler and purchaser of influence are individuals outside the administration, meaning that the former’s conduct would not jeopardize its proper functioning. In this context, the paper evaluates the compatibility of its typical structure with the technique of abstract danger classification and with the limiting principles of state ius puniendi, especially those of harmfulness and minimum intervention. The analysis leads to the conclusion that the criminal sanction for influence peddling is legitimate provided that the criminal offense is reformulated and that the effective intercession of the active subject before the public official is required as an objective element. In this way, the conduct of the trafficker is ex ante suitable for creating a prohibited risk to the proper functioning of the Administration, particularly with regard to its impartiality.

Received: 30 January 2026
Accepted: 13 May 2026

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Daniel Quispe Meza, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Perú

Abogado por la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú (PUCP). Magíster en Derecho Penal por la Universidad de Salamanca (España), doctorado en curso en el Programa de Doctorado Responsabilidad Jurídica. Estudio Multidisciplinar de la Universidad de León (España). Profesor a tiempo parcial por asignaturas en el Departamento Académico de Derecho de la PUCP. Miembro del Grupo de Investigación en Derecho Penal, Corrupción, Lavado de Activos, Trata de Personas y otras formas de criminalidad organizada (DEPECCO).

Published
2026-06-24
How to Cite
Quispe Meza, Daniel. 2026. “The Crime of Influence Peddling Involving Actual Influence in the Peruvian Criminal Code: A Critique of Its Legal Structure”. Estudios De Deusto 74 (1), 595-620. https://doi.org/10.18543/ed.3591.
Section
Iberoamerican Public Law